Copyright Arnaud De Grave / Agence Le Pictorium - stray dog;madagascar conservation & development

Barking up the right tree: Understanding local attitudes towards dogs in villages surrounding Ranomafana National Park, Madagascar can benefit applied conservation

Kim Valenta, Joseph A. Gettinger-Larson, Colin A. Chapman, Zach J. Farris


Exotic carnivores, particularly feral and domestic dogs, represent a serious threat to Madagascar’s endemic fauna. We obtained information from the local community about dogs in villages in and around Ranomafana National Park (RNP), Madagascar. Surveys were conducted (N=359) to assess local opinions of dogs, reasons for owning dogs, and the willingness of dog owners to participate in spay/neuter/vaccine programs. Of surveyed individuals without dogs (N=211), 58.9% of respondents reported negative feelings towards free-roaming dogs, with only 1% of respondents identifying free-roaming dogs as a positive aspect of village life. Of individuals with dogs (N=148), 8.1% of respondents reported using their dog for hunting, and 41.2% reported that their dog had killed at least one wild animal, with 11.8% reporting that this occurred on a weekly basis. Villagers approve of spay/neuter/vaccine programs and 90.3% of respondents with dogs state they would use them if freely available. The interest in veterinary services combined with a generally negative attitude towards free-roaming dogs indicates that a spay/neuter/vaccine program would be an effective means of controlling dog populations.



Les carnivores exotiques, particulièrement les chiens domestiques et ceux retournés à l’état sauvage, représentent une menace sérieuse pour la faune endémique de Madagascar. Nous avons récolté des informations auprès des communautés riveraines sur les chiens vivant dans les villages et autour du Parc National de Ranomafana (RNP) au sud-est de Madagascar. Nous avons mené des enquêtes (N=359) afin d’évaluer les avis de la communauté locale sur les chiens, les raisons pour lesquelles les gens possèdent ces animaux et la volonté des propriétaires pour s’engager dans un programme de stérilisation/vaccination canine. Les villageois qui ne possédaient pas de chiens (N=211) représentaient 58,9 % des personnes interrogées ; ils ont rapporté avoir des sentiments négatifs envers les chiens errants et seulement 1 % des personnes interrogées ont vu un aspect positif pour la vie du village dans les chiens errants. Parmi les propriétaires de chiens (N=148), 8,1 % des personnes interrogées ont rapporté utiliser leur chien pour la chasse et 41,2% des personnes interrogées indiquent que leur chien a déjà tué au moins un animal sauvage, dont 11,8 % rapportant que cela arrivait toutes les semaines. Les villageois approuvent le programme de stérilisation/vaccination canine et 90,3 % des propriétaires de chiens y auraient volontiers recours si celui-ci était gratuit et librement disponible.



Conservation canis familiaris hunting spay neuter feral dog

Full Text:



Barcala, O. 2009. Invasive Stray and Feral Dogs Limit Fosa (Cryptoprocta ferox) Populations in Ankarafantsika National Park, Madagascar. Duke University (M.Sc. thesis), Durham. Available at

Butler, J. R. A. and du Toit, J. T. 2002. Diet of free‐ranging domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) in rural Zimbabwe: implications for wild scavengers on the periphery of wildlife reserves. Animal Conservation 5, 1: 29–37. (doi:10.1017/S136794300200104X)

Butler, J. R. A., du Toit, J. T. and Bingham, J. 2004. Free-ranging domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) as predators and prey in rural Zimbabwe: threats of competition and disease to large wild carnivores. Biological Conservation 115, 3: 369–378. (doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00152-6)

Farris Z. J., Karpanty S. M., Ratelolahy F. and Kelly, M. J. 2014. Predator–primate distribution, activity, and co-occurrence in relation to habitat and human activity across fragmented and contiguous forests in northeastern Madagascar. International Journal of Primatology 35, 5: 859–880. (doi:10.1007/s10764-014-9786-0)

Farris, Z. J., Kelly, M. J., Karpanty, S. M. and Ratelolahy, F. 2015a. Patterns of spatial co-occurrence among native and exotic carnivores in north-eastern Madagascar. Animal Conservation 19, 2: 189–198. (doi:10.1111/acv.12233)

Farris, Z. J., Gerber, B. D., Karpanty, S., Murphy, A., Andrianjakarivelo, V., et al. 2015b. When carnivores roam: temporal patterns and partitioning among Madagascar’s native and exotic carnivores. Journal of Zoology 296, 1: 45–57. (doi:10.1111/jzo.12216)

Farris, Z. J., Golden, C. D.,.Karpanty, S. M., Murphy, A., Stauffer, D., et al. 2015c. Hunting, exotic carnivores, and habitat loss: anthropogenic effects on a native carnivore community, Madagascar. PloS ONE 10, 9: e0136456. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0136456)

Galetti, M. and Sazima, I. 2006. Impact of feral dogs in an urban Atlantic forest fragment in southeastern Brazil. Nature Conservation 4, 1: 146–151.

Ganzhorn, J. U., Lowry II, P. P., Schatz, G. E. and Sommer, S. 2001. The biodiversity of Madagascar: one of the world’s hottest hotspots on its way out. Oryx 35, 4: 346–348. (doi:10.1046/j.1365-3008.2001.00201.x)

Gavin, M. C., Solomon, J. N. and Blank, S. G. Measuring and monitoring illegal use of natural resources. Conservation Biology 24, 1: 89–100. (doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01387.x)

Gerber, B. D., Karpanty, S. M. and Randrianantenaina, J. 2012a. Activity patterns of carnivores in the rain forests of Madagascar: implications for species coexistence. Journal of Mammalogy 93, 3: 667–676. (doi:10.1644/11-MAMM-A-265.1)

Gerber, B. D., Karpanty, S. M. and Randrianantenaina, J. 2012b. The impact of forest logging and fragmentation on carnivore species composition, density and occupancy in Madagascar's rainforests. Oryx 46, 3: 414–422. (doi:10.1017/S0030605311001116)

Lacerda, A. C. R., Tomas, W. M. and Marinho‐Filho, J. 2009. Domestic dogs as an edge effect in the Brasília National Park, Brazil: interactions with native mammals. Animal Conservation 12, 5: 477–487. (doi:10.1111/j.1469-1795.2009.00277.x)

Lenth, B. E., Knight, R. L., and Brennan, M. E. 2008. The effects of dogs on wildlife communities. Natural Areas Journal 28, 3: 218–227. (doi: 10.3375/0885-8608(2008)28[218:TEODOW]2.0.CO;2)

Manor, R. and Saltz, D. 2004. The impact of free-roaming dogs on gazelle kid/female ratio in a fragmented area. Biological Conservation 119, 2: 231–236. (doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2003.11.005)

Overdorff 1993

Pochron, S. T., Morelli, T. L., Terranova, P., Scirbona, J., Cohen, J., et al. 2005. Patterns of male scent-marking in Propithecus edwardsi of Ranomafana National Park, Madagascar. American Journal of Primatology 65, 2: 103–105. (doi:10.1002/ajp.20102)

Ratsimbazafy, J. H., Arrigo-Nelson, S. J., Dollar, L., Holmes, C. M., Irwin, M. T., et al. 2013. Conservation of Malagasy prosimians: a view from the great red island. In: Leaping Ahead. J. Masters, M. Gamba and F. Génin (eds.), pp 387–396. Springer. (doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-4511-1_43)

Rennekamp, R. A. and Nall, M. A. 2000. Using focus group in program development and evaluation. University of Kentucky, College of Agriculture, Lexington. Available at

Ritchie, E. G., Dickman, C. R., Letnic, M. and Vanak, A. T. 2014. Dogs as predators and trophic regulators. In: Free-Ranging Dogs and Wildlife Conservation. M. E. Gompper (ed.), pp 55–68. Oxford University Press, Oxford. (doi:10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199663217.003.0002)

Vanak, A. T. and Gompper, M. E. 2009. Dogs Canis familiaris as carnivores: their role and function in intraguild competition. Mammal Review 39, 4: 265–283. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2907.2009.00148.x)

Weston, M. A. and Stankowich, T. 2013. Dogs as agents of disturbance. In: Free-Ranging Dogs and Wildlife Conservation. M. E. Gompper (ed.), pp 94–113. Oxford University Press, Oxford. (doi:10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199663217.003.0004)

Wright, P. C. 1995. Demography and life history of free-ranging Propithecus diadema edwardsi in Ranomafana National Park, Madagascar. International Journal of Primatology 16: 835–854. (doi:10.1007/BF02735722)

Young, J. K., Olson, K. A., Reading, R. P., Amgalanbaatar, S. and Berger, J. 2011. Is wildlife going to the dogs? Impacts of feral and free-roaming dogs on wildlife populations. Bioscience 61, 2: 125–132. (doi:10.1525/bio.2011.61.2.7)

Madag. conserv. dev.
ISSN: 1662-2510